<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sell to Camera &#187; ON2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selltocamera.com/tag/on2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selltocamera.com</link>
	<description>A blog for business professionals speaking to camera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Video quality: Webcams simply not up to job</title>
		<link>http://selltocamera.com/do-not-use-a-webcam-for-business-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://selltocamera.com/do-not-use-a-webcam-for-business-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Biss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camcorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HFS10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ON2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sorenson Squeeze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selltocamera.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick test comparing a reasonable quality webcam with a HD camcorder demonstrates why you need a camcorder for business videos.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A quick test comparing a reasonable quality webcam with a HD camcorder demonstrates why you need a camcorder for business videos.</strong></p>
<p>This first video on <cite>Sell&nbsp;to&nbsp;Camera</cite> is a short test I recorded to show you the difference in quality between a good webcam and a HD camcorder. This gives a first taste of the quality we can achieve with our business videos.</p>
<p><span id="more-777"></span></p>
<p class="figure"> <iframe width="622" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rJIhLAnanDw?fs=1&feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <br /><br /><span class="figcaption"><em>Image: Short test video showing the difference in quality between a typical webcam and a HD digital camcorder. The video was shot with natural lighting in an office environment.  [If your RSS reader doesn&rsquo;t show the YouTube video embedded above then please visit the <a href="http://selltocamera.com/do-not-use-a-webcam-for-business-videos/" title="Video quality: Webcams simply not up to job">original post</a> in your browser.]</em></span> </p>
<h2>The plan</h2>
<p>For this test I put my office clock on a chair and zoomed in to better capture the moving second hand. This shows the sort of zoom levels needed for close-ups in an office setting; the sort that we need for a &#8221;hello&#8221;  type web video.</p>
<h2>Lighting</h2>
<p>My office is north-facing and has no direct sunlight. It was  late in the afternoon and lighting levels were low. Apart from the ceiling light there was no other lighting.</p>
<h2>Webcam</h2>
<p>I set my <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/webcams/logitech-quickcam-pro-9000/4505-6502_7-32509550.html">Logitech  Quickcam Pro 9000 webcam</a> to record at 1600&#215;1200 resolution. The  image is large but the quality is poor at this zoom and light level. The frame rate is 12.5 frame per second (fps); too slow for smooth movement in live video.</p>
<h2>HD Camcorder</h2>
<p>The second image is from my <a title="Canon LEGRIA HF S10 Review" href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/Canon-LEGRIA-HF-S10_Camcorder_review">Canon  LEGRIA HF S10 high definition camcorder</a>. I literally put  the camera on a tripod, turned it on and pressed  record. The default image size is 1440&#215;1080 <em>(the  largest is 1920&#215;1080: full HD). </em>The frame rate is 25fps as this is a  European <a title="PAL, short for Phase Alternating Line, is an analogue television encoding system used in broadcast television systems in large parts of the world." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAL">PAL</a> camera <em>(and not the US <a title="NTSC, named for the National Television System(s) Committee, is the analog television system that is/was used in most of the Americas, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ntsc">NTSC</a> version which records at 30fps)</em>.</p>
<h2>Editing</h2>
<p>The webcam output was in <a title="Windows Media Video (WMV) is a compressed video file format for several proprietary codecs developed by Microsoft." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wmv">WMV</a> format and the camcorder  output in <a title="AVCHD is a format for the recording and playback of high definition video." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVCHD">AVCHD</a> format.  I brought both  media files into <a title="Video editing, audio production, and DVD authoring come together in a single, powerful solution." href="http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/moviestudiope">Sony Vegas Movie Studio  v9 Platinum Edition</a> to edit into the video. I trimmed the tracks, added the titles and a transition between the two recordings. For this test I did no colour correction or any other content edits or adjustments.</p>
<h2>Rendering</h2>
<p>From Sony Vegas I rendered the edited movie into <a title="Audio Video Interleave, known by its acronym AVI, is a multimedia container format introduced by Microsoft in November 1992." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_Video_Interleave">AVI</a> format at 640&#215;480 and 25fps. AVI is uncompressed, so the quality is high but comes at the price of size. This video runs for 18 seconds; even so, Sony Vegas took 75 seconds to create the AVI file; which, at 543MB in size, works out to 30MB per second. It is a good thing  that large disks are now so cheap!</p>
<h2>Encoding</h2>
<p>The next step was to encode the AVI file into a Flash Video (<a title="Flash Video is a container file format used to deliver video over the Internet using Adobe Flash Player" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flv">FLV</a>) file for playing on the web. For this I used <a title="Prime your video for Flash output using the highest quality presets." href="http://www.sorensonmedia.com/video-encoding/">Sorenson Squeeze 5 for  Flash Pro</a> for with the high-quality MainConcept H.264 codec. On my Intel Core Duo desktop <em>(2.4Ghz, 4GB  RAM)</em> the encoding batch job took around 58 seconds create a 3.6MB MP4 file ready for uploading.</p>
<h2>Hosting</h2>
<p>To improve streaming performance and to keep bandwidth costs down the MP4  file is not hosted on my web hosting account. Instead, I host the MP4 file on the <a title="Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) is an online storage web service offered by Amazon Web Services." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_S3">Amazon S3 cloud storage  platform</a>. A DNS entry for the media sub domain means that any files  referenced at http://media.selltocamera.com are  actually coming from my S3 account.</p>
<h2>Playing</h2>
<p>As mentioned in my earlier post on <a title="A quick introduction to how video embedding really works" href="http://selltocamera.com/introduction-to-how-video-embedding-works/">how  video embedding works</a>, a flash player is required to actually display the  flash video file. For this example I am using the <a title="The JW FLV Player is the Internet's most popular and flexible media player." href="http://www.longtailvideo.com/players/jw-flv-player/">JW FLV Media Player</a>. This is a widely used player with extensive plugin support, including metrics on how long each video is watched.</p>
<p><em>If you are reading this in your RSS feed reader and cannot see the video at the start then please read the post on the website. Thanks.</em></p>
<h2>Resolutions</h2>
<p>The video is initially displayed on the blog at 512&#215;384 pixels <em>(4:3  format)</em>. You can see the high quality 640&#215;480 version by clicking on the  &#8220;show full screen&#8221; button.</p>
<h2>Coming up</h2>
<p>So, there we are: the very first video published on <cite>Sell&nbsp;to&nbsp;Camera</cite> I think you will agree that a webcam does not have anything like good enough  quality for creating professional web videos for your business.</p>
<p>In the up-coming posts I will cover all these steps in more detail, talking  about concrete steps to create you own web videos. It is not as complicated as  it might look at first glance, and is easily within the technical ability and budget of most businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://selltocamera.com/do-not-use-a-webcam-for-business-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

